RESEARCH ARTICLE

Chronic low back pain, 20 years follow up after back school and shiatsu massage in a controlled, blind, perspective, randomized trial

G Mandalà.¹ R Bordonaro.¹ A Digangi.¹ G Letizia Mauro.²

¹ UOC Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Buccheri La Ferla Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Palermo
² Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Stomatology, University of Palermo

Corresponding Author: Giorgio Mandalà. Buccheri LaFerla Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Received: July 24, 2023                                                   Published: August 04, 2023

Citation: G Mandalà. Chronic low back pain, 20 years follow up after back school and shiatsu massage in a controlled, blind, perspective, randomized trial. Int J Complement Intern Med. 2023;5(1):203–211. DOI: 10. 58349/IJCIM. 1. 5. 2023. 00133 

Copyright: ©2023 Mandalà. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.

Abstract 

Background: Lot of studies have been made to demonstrate effectiveness of therapy in acute and sub acute l.b.p. Less are the trials about therapies in chronic l.b.p. Many people have experienced subjective effectiveness of massage, reflex therapy, but there are really few studies evaluating their objective effectiveness. 

Aims: Verify after 20 years follow up, the trend of the low back pain and the treatments used, in time, after the treatments carried out, in reducing pain and disability of people with chronic l.b.p. 

Materials and Methods: A preliminary trial including patients with l.b.p. since three month. All the subjects hadn’t sciatica, neurological signs, evident alteration on x-ray, they were randomised. An independent blind observatory evaluates the preliminary results on pain and disability with two item scales, Backill and Mcgill pain questionnaire. About 20 years after the end of treatment we made a recall with telephone interview about the trend of back pain in 20 years. 

Results: All the participants recalled answered the brief questionnaire proposed, all of them had recurrent back pain. 

Conclusion: Chronic low back pain it’s a difficult trial for every physician. The role of education and self-care seems to be one of the important factors for the management of c.l.b.p. 

Background: Low back pain (LBP) remains a problem at epidemic proportion, a burden for the patient, the family, and the economy. Despite the multiplicity of treatments available, a clear choice of effective treatment has not emerged. Massage therapy has a long history, and is associated with various effects that, in the symptomatic treatment, are potentially beneficial. Ernst in his systematic review analysed four trials comparing massage with other therapies. All of those trials are burdened with methodological flaws; however there is some evidence that massage is effective. Pope et al. compared spinal manipulation, with t.e.n.s., corset and massage in sub acute low back pain, but used massage like a placebo group and concluded that there are no significant differences between treatments. Also Gillan used in his trial, massage like a control group receiving nonspecific back massage comparing to McKenzie protocol. Cherkin in his randomised trial, compared massage vs acupuncture and self-care in back pain persisting at least six weeks. He found that massage is clearly superior in back function and satisfaction, there were no significant differences in symptoms. Also acupuncture had better results in satisfaction. Before alternatives therapies such as massage and acupuncture, are incorporated into standard primary care practice, more scientifically rigorous studies are needed, to determine which treatments are consistently cost-effective for LBP.

References 

1. E Ernst MD. Massage therapy for low back pain: a systematic revue. Journal of Pain Symp Man Elsevier. 1999;17(1):65-69. 

2. M Pope, R Phillips. A prospective randomized three– week trial of spinal manipulations, Transcutaneous Muscle Stimulation, Massage and Corset in the treatment of subacute Low back pain. Spine. 1994;19(22):2571-2577. 

3. M Gillan, J Ross. The natural History of trunk list, its associated disability and the influence of McKenzie Management. Eur Spine Jour. 1998;7(6):480-483. 

4. D Cherkin. Acupuncture vs. Massage vs. Self care for persisting back pain: a randomised trial. Back Letter Lippincot & Wilkins. 1998;13(11):127-130. 

5. L Tesio, C Granger, R Fiedler. A unidimesional pain/disability measure for low-back pain syndromes. Pain. 1997;69:269-278. 

6. Versloot JM. The cost-effectiveness of a back school program in industry. Spine. 1992;17:22-27. 

7. R Melzack. The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:275-283. 

8. G Majani, E Sanavio. Semantics of pain in Italy: the italian version of the McGill Questionnaire. Pain. 1985;22:399-405. 

9. R Melzack. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30:191-197. 

10. G Mandalà. Metodologia diagnostica nella lombalgia. Sicilia Ortop. 1998;1:16-18. 

11. O Menoni, F DeMarco. La back school per un efficace trattamento delle rachialgie. Milano EPM Ed. 1994. 

12. G Mandalà, R Bordonaro, A Digangi, et al. Back School Versus Shiatsu Massage Reflex Therapy: A Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Proceedings of the 1st world congress of ISPRM Amsterdam, 2001 Monduzzi Editore.